Ｐａｇｅ 23810 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 通常モードに戻る ┃ ＩＮＤＥＸ ┃ ≪前へ │ 次へ≫ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ▼girls in spanish PrestonTof 20/9/5(土) 6:07 ─────────────────────────────────────── ■題名 ： girls in spanish ■名前 ： PrestonTof <fgdghhgh@pop.com> ■日付 ： 20/9/5(土) 6:07 ■Ｗｅｂ ： https://meetspanishwomen.wixsite.com/meetspanishwomen/post/what-s-special-about-spanish-women -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| aspects of Spanish Peru Guaman Poma, Jos Gabriel Tupac Amaru, And Josephe de Mugaburu provided viewpoints of life and customs in Spanish Peru with their distinct rhetorical styles. Their articles both differ and resemble one, Influenced by their personal and historical backgrounds, Each providing a better know-how about colonial culture. Guaman Poma, Tupac Amaru, And Mugaburu facets depended highly on their race and social circles; Guaman Poma and Tupac Amaru rhetoric generated a sense of urgency and demanded identification from their audiences while Josephe de Mugaburu rhetoric had less personal appeal in his account acting like a note taker of city life. similarly, in spite of their rhetorical style, All men emphasised the impact of the Catholic Church and the culture of corruption and injustice in Spanish Peru. Guaman Poma rhetoric in First New Chronicle and Good feds evoked a sense of urgency with a paternal and observational tone as he criticized customs of officials in Spanish Peru. Guaman Poma, the actual Quechua real noblema goodn, Wrote a undergone critique of Spanish Peru in early 17th century.<>] taking care of of colonial life he criticized was the corregidor position. Guaman Poma described bad and illustrations. Guaman Poma made a clear significant using the Catholic doctrine as a benchmark; The good are sterling and the bad are not. This is analogous to his brief description of bad priests that were tempered, Despotic, satisfied, jam-packed with disdain <>They forget our Lord Jesus Christ made himself poor and humble. Guaman Poma literature provides absorbing insight about colonial culture because he was an indigenous loyal and supportive to the Christian faith. This expresses how in such short amount of time (Within decades of Spanish cure) The Catholic Church had engrained itself into native culture in a way that natives like Guaman Poma became fully loyal to the faith. at the same time, While Guaman Poma defended natives by mentioning injustices with his writing, His main objective was to defend the honor of good governing and the Christian faith. Jos Gabriel Tupac Amaru was the cacique of the city Pampamarca who led a rebellion in Spanish Peru that culminated around 1780. His rhetoric evoked a sense of urgency like that of Guaman Poma since he wanted people to join his cause the particular rebellion. significantly like Guaman Poma, Tupac Amaru was loyal to the melinda faith and critical of corregidores in Spanish Peru. in proclamation, Tupac Amaru claims, Jos simply because of the grace of God, Inca full of Peru <>adhere to shall only be held for the priesthood. We shall pay the tenth and first dry fruits, which might be given to God. some people, Tupac Amaru believed he was a true Inca while preferring to embrace the faith of the conquerors of the Inca kingdom. This devotion to the Catholic faith resembles the action the Church had to root their presence in the New World. most notably Guaman Poma, Tupac Amaru was faithful to the Catholic doctrine and never would definitely change its presence. Tupac Amaru seemed to be critical of corregidores, But dissimilar Guaman Poma, He was rebellious and wanted vengeance. The time had come when they must shake off the heavy burden corregidores of the dominion would be punished in equal measure for all the taxes they had imposed would exterminate all Europeans. Tupac Amaru wanted relieve all Spanish customs, with the exception the Catholic Church. Guaman Poma and Tupac Amaru criticized the Spanish heavily but embraced their religion with pride. This suggests that the Catholic Church was neutral when it came to the Spanish image of injustice portrayed by the writings. that may be, beyond all the injustice caused by Spanish, The Church was separate from Spanish customs thus could be honorably accepted by the indigenous world. Though Guaman Poma and Tupac Amaru both belittled the Spanish, Guaman Poma used a paternal and observational stance, While dating in spanish Tupac Amaru took a more rebellious stance. Both were resistant to the social inflictions of the Spanish on indigenous life. What was critical commentary for an observant noble native in 1600s was part of the understandings for rebellion by 1700s revealed by Tupac Amaru. Josephe de Mugaburu wrote of Colonial Lima, 1640 1697 from medium of a diary, Acting more as a city admin taking notes of city life. Mugaburu was a Spaniard thus void from most injustices invoked however Indians. His writing presented girl in spanish clear plus the the inequality imposed on non Spaniards in Lima. Count of Santisteban issued an edict proclaiming that no Indian, Mulatto, Or Negro carry a blade, Dagger, knife, or else machete, Under fine of two years in the galleys. The inequality lies in how Spaniards could carry more types of weapons and receive a less severe penalties than mixed race peoples. The power and fear for people of the church is also insisted on in their lesser punishment decreed by the governance. This inequality was deeply engrained in society as similar versions of this edict were announced in 1653, 1661, 1663, And 1667 in Mugaburu entries. Similarly such as injustice, Mulatto great women, Nor Negro sweetheart, Free or slave, Wear woolen wash rag, Nor any gauze of silk, Nor wide lace top of gold, silver precious metal, Black or the white kind of. This edict on banning what non Spanish women could wear was proof on elegance and inequality in Spanish Peru. Mugaburu did not express any personal attachment or emotion to these occurrences, but instead only reported them as if it were his job. He did not explain the inequality in the edicts; truly, It is only assumed that Mugaburu indeed agreed with the edicts proclaimed. Mugaburu entries help understand the culture of wasted governance and social disobedience in Spanish Peru. The ban on weapons was announced four times in Mugaburu account. The redundancy of this edict over short time implies that society was not following rules though the edicts were highly unjust in nature. The ban on goods that mulatto or black women could wear, Also very well unequal, Reveals how the socially elite Spanish did not want to allow the method for other races to display wealth. get the job done woman was free, dreadful not wear the banned items; Thus it was a matter of race and skin color more than socioeconomic status that determined the script of the edict. Both edicts proclaimed in Mugaburu account were proof of injustices in Spanish Peru. The rhetoric written by Mugaburu differs, As he was not intending on generating a response or trying to evoke a sense of urgency from the general audience like Guaman Poma and Tupac Amaru. Guaman Poma was not rebellious like Tupac Amaru; in exchange, He tried to a response and evoke a sense of urgency with his extensive critique of corregidores, Among other social areas of Spanish Peru. although, Josephe de Mugaburu knew about data corruption and injustices he only reported them in his writing. dissimilar to Guaman Poma and Tupac Amaru, Mugaburu was a Spaniard automatically part of an elite class and void from many injustices by simply Guaman Poma Indians. Guaman Poma, Of native background, Was personally subject to corregidores with the unjust incarceration of his disciple. and additionally, He was moved by the un Christian governance and thus had an individual nuance in his rhetoric. furthermore, Tupac Amaru echoed the literature of Guaman Poma with a rebellious and vengeful attitude. |